| |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Not Applicable
|
|
| |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
| |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
| | | | | | ii | | | |
| | | | | | 1 | | | |
| | | | | | 10 | | | |
| | | | | | 12 | | | |
| | | | | | 13 | | | |
| | | | | | 14 | | | |
| | | | | | 23 | | | |
| | | | | | 24 | | | |
| | | | | | 45 | | | |
| | | | | | 52 | | | |
| | | | | | 56 | | | |
| | | | | | 57 | | | |
| | | | | | 59 | | | |
| | | | | | 60 | | | |
| | | | | | 61 | | | |
| | | | | | 62 | | |
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| |
Mergers and Similar Arrangements
|
| |
The Companies Act (As Revised) permits mergers and consolidations between Cayman Islands companies and between Cayman Islands companies and non-Cayman Islands companies. For these purposes, (1) “merger” means the merging of two or more constituent companies and the vesting of their undertaking, property and liabilities in one of such companies as the surviving company, and (2) a “consolidation” means the combination of two or more constituent companies into a consolidated company and the vesting of the undertaking, property and liabilities of such companies to the consolidated company. In order to effect such a merger or consolidation, the directors of each constituent company must approve a written plan of merger or consolidation, which must then be authorized by (a) a special resolution of the shareholders of each constituent company, and (b) such other authorization, if any, as may be specified in such constituent company’s articles of association. The written plan of merger or consolidation must be filed with the Registrar of Companies of the Cayman Islands together with a declaration as to the solvency of the surviving or consolidated company, a declaration as to the assets and liabilities of each constituent company, and an undertaking that a copy of the certificate of merger or consolidation will be given to the members and creditors of each constituent company and that notification of the merger or consolidation will be published in the Cayman Islands Gazette. Court approval is not required for a merger or consolidation which is effected in compliance with these statutory procedures.
|
| |
Under Delaware law, with certain exceptions, a merger, a consolidation, or a sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all the assets of a corporation must be approved by the board of directors and a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. However, unless required by its certificate of incorporation, approval is not required by the holders of the outstanding stock of a constituent corporation surviving a merger if:
•
the merger agreement does not amend in any respect its certificate of incorporation;
•
each share of its stock outstanding prior to the merger will be an identical share of stock following the merger; and
•
either no shares of the surviving corporation’s common stock and no shares, securities or obligations convertible into such stock will be issued or delivered pursuant to the merger, or the authorized unissued shares or treasury shares of the surviving corporation’s common stock to be issued or delivered pursuant to the merger plus those initially issuable upon conversion of any other shares, securities or obligations to be issued or delivered pursuant to the merger do not exceed 20% of the shares of the surviving corporation’s common stock outstanding immediately prior to the effective date of the merger.
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| | | | |
A merger between a Cayman parent company and its Cayman subsidiary or subsidiaries does not require authorization by a resolution of shareholders of that Cayman subsidiary if a copy of the plan of merger is given to every member of that Cayman subsidiary to be merged unless that member agrees otherwise. For this purpose, a company is a “parent” of a subsidiary if it holds issued shares that together represent at least 90% of the votes at a general meeting of the subsidiary.
The consent of each holder of a fixed or floating security interest over a constituent company is required unless this requirement is waived by a court in the Cayman Islands.
|
| |
Mergers in which one corporation owns 90% or more of a second corporation may be completed without the vote of the second corporation’s board of directors or stockholders.
|
|
| | | | |
Save in certain limited circumstances, a shareholder of a Cayman constituent company who dissents from the merger or consolidation is entitled to payment of the fair value of his shares (which, if not agreed between the parties, will be determined by the Cayman Islands court) upon dissenting to the merger or consolidation; provided that the dissenting shareholder complies strictly with the procedures set out in the Companies Act (As Revised). The exercise of dissenter rights will preclude the exercise by the dissenting shareholder of any other rights to which he or she might otherwise be entitled by virtue of holding shares, save for the right to seek relief on the grounds that the merger or consolidation is void or unlawful.
Separate from the statutory provisions relating to mergers and consolidations, the Companies Act (As Revised) also contains statutory provisions that facilitate the reconstruction and amalgamation of companies by way of schemes of arrangement; provided that the arrangement is approved by (a) 75% in value of shareholders or class of shareholders, as the case may be, or (b) a majority in number representing 75% in value of the creditors or class of creditors, as the case may be, with whom the arrangement is to be made, that are, in each case, present and voting either in person or by proxy at a meeting, or
|
| |
Generally, a stockholder of a publicly traded corporation does not have appraisal rights in connection with a merger.
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| | | | |
meetings, convened for that purpose. The convening of the meetings and subsequently the arrangement must be sanctioned by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands. While a dissenting shareholder has the right to express to the court the view that the transaction ought not to be approved, the court can be expected to approve the arrangement if it determines that:
•
the statutory provisions as to the required majority vote have been met;
•
the shareholders have been fairly represented at the meeting in question and the statutory majority are acting bona fide without coercion of the minority to promote interests adverse to those of the class;
•
the arrangement is such that may be reasonably approved by an intelligent and honest man of that class acting in respect of his interest; and
•
the arrangement is not one that would more properly be sanctioned under some other provision of the Companies Act (As Revised).
The Companies Act (As Revised) also contains a statutory power of compulsory acquisition which may facilitate the “squeeze out” of dissentient minority shareholders upon a tender offer. When a tender offer is made and accepted by holders of 90.0% of the shares affected within four months, the offeror may, within a two-month period commencing on the expiration of such four-month period, require the holders of the remaining shares to transfer such shares to the offeror on the terms of the offer. An objection can be made to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands but this is unlikely to succeed in the case of an offer which has been so approved unless there is evidence of fraud, bad faith or collusion.
If an arrangement and reconstruction by way of scheme of arrangement is thus approved and sanctioned, or if a tender offer is made and accepted in accordance with the foregoing statutory procedures, a dissenting shareholder would have no rights comparable to appraisal rights,
|
| | | |
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| | | | |
which would otherwise ordinarily be available to dissenting shareholders of Delaware corporations, providing rights to receive payment in cash for the judicially determined value of the shares.
|
| | | |
| |
Shareholders’ Suits
|
| |
In principle, we will normally be the proper plaintiff to sue for a wrong done to us as a company, and as a general rule a derivative action may not be brought by a minority shareholder. However, based on English authorities, which would in all likelihood be of persuasive authority in the Cayman Islands, the Cayman Islands court can be expected to follow and apply the common law principles (namely the rule in Foss v. Harbottle and the exceptions thereto) so that a non-controlling shareholder may be permitted to commence a class action against or derivative actions in the name of the company to challenge actions where:
•
a company acts or proposes to act illegally or ultra vires;
•
the act complained of, although not ultra vires, could only be effected duly if authorized by more than a simple majority vote that has not been obtained; and
•
those who control the company are perpetrating a “fraud on the minority.”
|
| |
Class actions and derivative actions generally are available to stockholders under Delaware law for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and actions not taken in accordance with applicable law. In such actions, the court generally has discretion to permit a winning plaintiff to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action.
|
|
| |
Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers and Limitation of Liability
|
| |
Cayman Islands law does not limit the extent to which a company’s memorandum and articles of association may provide for indemnification of officers and directors, except to the extent any such provision may be held by the Cayman Islands courts to be contrary to public policy, such as to provide indemnification against civil fraud or the consequences of committing a crime. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that we shall indemnify our directors and officers, against all actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages or liabilities incurred or sustained by such directors or officer, other than by reason of such person’s dishonesty, willful default or fraud, in or about the conduct of our company’s business or affairs (including as a result of any mistake of
|
| |
A corporation has the power to indemnify any director, officer, employee, or agent of the corporation who was, is or is threatened to be made a party to an action, suit or proceeding who acted in good faith and in a manner they believed to be in the best interests of the corporation, and if with respect to a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct would be unlawful, against amounts actually and reasonably incurred. Additionally, under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a Delaware corporation must indemnify its present or former directors and officers against expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred to the extent that the officer or director has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding brought against him or her
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| | | | |
judgment) or in the execution or discharge of his duties, powers, authorities or discretions, including without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, any costs, expenses, losses or liabilities incurred by such director or officer in defending (whether successfully or otherwise) any civil proceedings concerning our company or our affairs in any court whether in the Cayman Islands or elsewhere.
In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers that provide such persons with additional indemnification beyond that provided in the Articles.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers or persons controlling us under the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
|
| |
by reason of the fact that he or she is or was a director or officer of the corporation.
|
|
| |
Directors’ Fiduciary Duties
|
| |
As a matter of Cayman Islands law, a director of a Cayman Islands company is in the position of a fiduciary with respect to the company and therefore it is considered that he owes the following duties to the company — a duty to act in good faith in the best interests of the company, a duty not to make a personal profit based on his position as director (unless the company permits him to do so), a duty not to put himself in a position where the interests of the company conflict with his personal interest or his duty to a third party and a duty to exercise powers for the purpose for which such powers were intended. A director of a Cayman Islands company owes to the company a duty to act with skill and care. It was previously considered that a director need not exhibit in the performance of his duties a greater degree of skill than may reasonably be expected from a person of his knowledge and experience. However, English and Commonwealth courts have moved toward an objective standard with regard to the required skill and care and
|
| |
Under Delaware corporate law, a director of a Delaware corporation has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders. This duty has two components: the duty of care and the duty of loyalty. The duty of care requires that a director act in good faith, with the care that an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances. Under this duty, a director must inform himself of, and disclose to shareholders, all material information reasonably available regarding a significant transaction.
The duty of loyalty requires that a director acts in a manner he reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation. He must not use his corporate position for personal gain or advantage. This duty prohibits self-dealing by a director and mandates that the best interest of the corporation and its shareholders take precedence over any interest possessed by a director, officer or controlling shareholder and not shared by the shareholders generally.
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| | | | |
these authorities are likely to be followed in the Cayman Islands.
|
| |
In general, actions of a director are presumed to have been made on an informed basis, in good faith and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. However, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence of a breach of one of the fiduciary duties. Should such evidence be presented concerning a transaction by a director, the director must prove the procedural fairness of the transaction, and that the transaction was of fair value to the corporation.
|
|
| |
Shareholder Action by Written Consent
|
| |
Cayman Islands law and our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provide that our shareholders may approve corporate matters by way of a unanimous written resolution signed by or on behalf of each shareholder who would have been entitled to vote on such matter at a general meeting without a meeting being held.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may eliminate the right of shareholders to act by written consent by amendment to its certificate of incorporation.
|
|
| |
Shareholder Proposals
|
| |
The Companies Act provides shareholders with only limited rights to requisition a general meeting, and does not provide shareholders with any right to put any proposal before a general meeting. However, these rights may be provided in a company’s articles of association. However, the Articles do not contain such rights. As a Cayman Islands exempted company, we are not obliged by law to call shareholders’ annual general meetings.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a shareholder has the right to put any proposal before the annual meeting of shareholders; provided that it complies with the notice provisions in the governing documents. A special meeting may be called by the board of directors or any other person authorized to do so in the governing documents, but shareholders may be precluded from calling special meetings.
|
|
| |
Cumulative Voting
|
| |
Cumulative voting potentially facilitates the representation of minority shareholders on a board of directors since it permits the minority shareholder to cast all the votes to which the shareholder is entitled on a single director, which increases the shareholder’s voting power with respect to electing such director. There are no prohibitions in relation to cumulative voting under the laws of the Cayman Islands, but our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association do not provide for cumulative voting. As a result, our shareholders are not afforded any less protections or rights on this issue than shareholders of a Delaware corporation.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, cumulative voting for elections of directors is not permitted unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation specifically provides for it.
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| |
Removal of Directors
|
| |
Under our Articles, a director (other than the Sponsor Director and any of the Betters Directors) may be removed by way of an ordinary resolution of shareholders at any time before the expiration of his period of office notwithstanding anything in the Articles or in any agreement between our company and such director. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Sponsor Director may be removed by the Sponsor and the Betters Directors may be removed by Betters Medical (or its affiliates), in each case, by written notice to our company. A vacancy on the board created by the removal of a director pursuant to the above may be filled by the election or appointment by ordinary resolution of shareholders at the meeting at which such director is removed or by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the remaining directors present and voting at a board meeting provided, that in the case of the removal of the Sponsor Director or any of the Betters Directors, the Sponsor and/or Betters Medical (or its affiliates) shall solely be entitled to appoint another person as the Sponsor Director or the Betters Director. Under the Articles, a director’s office shall be vacated if the director (i) becomes bankrupt or has a receiving order made against him or suspends payment or compounds with his creditors; (ii) is found to be or becomes of unsound mind or dies; (iii) resigns his office by notice in writing to our company; (iv) other than the Sponsor Director or any of the Betters Directors, without special leave of absence from the board of directors, is absent from three consecutive meetings of the board and the board resolves that his office be vacated; (v) is prohibited by law from being a director or; (vi) is removed from office pursuant to the laws of the Cayman Islands or any other provisions of the Articles.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a director of a corporation with a classified board may be removed only for cause with the approval of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
|
|
| |
Transactions with Interested Shareholders
|
| |
Cayman Islands law has no comparable statute. As a result, we cannot avail ourselves of the types of protections afforded by the Delaware business combination statute. However, although Cayman Islands law does not regulate transactions between a company and its
|
| |
The Delaware General Corporation Law contains a business combination statute applicable to Delaware corporations whereby, unless the corporation has specifically elected not to be governed by such statute by amendment to its certificate of incorporation, it is
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| | | | |
significant shareholders, the directors of our company are required to comply with fiduciary duties which they owe to our company under Cayman Islands laws, including the duty to ensure that, in their opinion, any such transactions must be entered into bona fide in the best interests of the company and not with the effect of constituting a fraud on the minority shareholders.
|
| |
prohibited from engaging in certain business combinations with an “interested shareholder” for three years following the date that such person becomes an interested shareholder. An interested shareholder generally is a person or a group who or which owns or owned 15% or more of the target’s outstanding voting shares within the past three years. This has the effect of limiting the ability of a potential acquirer to make a two-tiered bid for the target in which all shareholders would not be treated equally. The statute does not apply if, among other things, prior to the date on which such shareholder becomes an interested shareholder, the board of directors approves either the business combination or the transaction which resulted in the person becoming an interested shareholder. This encourages any potential acquirer of a Delaware corporation to negotiate the terms of any acquisition transaction with the target’s board of directors.
|
|
| |
Dissolution; Winding Up
|
| |
Under Cayman Islands law, a company may be wound up by either an order of the courts of the Cayman Islands or by a special resolution of its members or, if the company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due, by an ordinary resolution of its members. The court has authority to order winding up in a number of specified circumstances including where it is, in the opinion of the court, just and equitable to do so.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, unless the board of directors approves the proposal to dissolve, dissolution must be approved by shareholders holding 100% of the total voting power of the corporation. Only if the dissolution is initiated by the board of directors may it be approved by a simple majority of the corporation’s outstanding shares. Delaware law allows a Delaware corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation a supermajority voting requirement in connection with dissolutions initiated by either an order of the courts of the Cayman Islands or by the board of directors.
|
|
| |
Variation of Rights of Shares
|
| |
Under the Articles, if our share capital is divided into more than one class of shares, the rights attached to any such class may only be varied with the sanction of a resolution passed by a majority of two- thirds of the votes cast at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may vary the rights of a class of shares with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares of such class, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
|
|
| | | | |
Cayman Islands
|
| |
Delaware
|
|
| |
Amendment of Governing Documents
|
| |
Under the Companies Act and our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, our memorandum and articles of association may only be amended by a special resolution of our shareholders.
|
| |
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation’s governing documents may be amended with the approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, unless the certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.
|
|
| |
Rights of Non-resident or Foreign Shareholders
|
| |
There are no limitations imposed by our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association on the rights of non-resident or foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights on our shares. In addition, there are no provisions in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association that require our company to disclose shareholder ownership above any particular ownership threshold.
|
| |
Under Delaware General Corporation Law, there are no restrictions on foreign shareholders, and all the stock or membership interests in a Delaware company can be owned by non-U.S. nationals.
|
|
| | | |
Securities
beneficially owned prior to this offering |
| |
Securities to
be sold in this offering |
| |
Securities
beneficially owned after this offering |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of Selling Securityholder
|
| |
Ordinary
Shares |
| |
%(1)
|
| |
Ordinary
Shares |
| |
Ordinary
Shares(1)(2) |
| |
%(1)(2)
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
ExcelFin SPAC LLC(3)
|
| | | | 4,773,406 | | | | | | 12.9 | | | | | | 4,773,406 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Nautilus Master Fund LP(4)
|
| | | | 125,000 | | | | | | 0.3 | | | | | | 125,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Highbridge Tactical Credit Master Fund LP(5)
|
| | | | 99,625 | | | | | | 0.3 | | | | | | 99,625 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Highbridge Tactical Credit Institutional Fund Ltd(6)
|
| | | | 25,375 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 25,375 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Radcliffe SPAC Master Fund LP(7)
|
| | | | 125,000 | | | | | | 0.3 | | | | | | 125,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Fir Tree Value Master Fund LP(8)
|
| | | | 1,669 | | | | | | * | | | | | | 1,669 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Fir Tree Capital Opportunity Master Fund LP(9)
|
| | | | 1,018 | | | | | | * | | | | | | 1,018 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Fir Tree Capital Opportunity Master Fund III LP(10)
|
| | | | 1,667 | | | | | | * | | | | | | 1,667 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
FT SOF XIII (SPAC) Holdings LLC(11)
|
| | | | 24,225 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 24,225 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Boston Patriot Merrimack St LLC(12)
|
| | | | 96,421 | | | | | | 0.3 | | | | | | 96,421 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Camac Fund LP(13)
|
| | | | 75,000 | | | | | | 0.2 | | | | | | 75,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Exos Collateralized SPAC Holdings Fund LP(14)
|
| | | | 80,000 | | | | | | 0.2 | | | | | | 80,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
AQR Absolute Return Master Account LP(15)
|
| | | | 7,735 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 7,735 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
AQR SPAC Opportunities Offshore Fund LP(16)
|
| | | | 3,425 | | | | | | * | | | | | | 3,425 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
AQR TA Global Alpha Fund LP(17)
|
| | | | 5,036 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 5,036 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
AQR Funds – AQR Diversified Arbitrage Fund(18)
|
| | | | 46,529 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 46,529 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
AQR Global Alternative Investment Offshore Fund LP-
SPACs Sleeve(19) |
| | | | 62,275 | | | | | | 0.2 | | | | | | 62,275 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
James Lee Lapp(20)
|
| | | | 12,500 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 12,500 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Perga Capital Partners LP(21)
|
| | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
TQ Master Fund LP(22)
|
| | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
RLH SPAC Fund LP(23)
|
| | | | 37,500 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 37,500 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
BoothBay Absolute Return Strategies LP(24)
|
| | | | 33,733 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 33,733 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Boothbay Diversified Alpha Master Fund LP(25)
|
| | | | 29,590 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 29,590 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Sandia Crest LP(26)
|
| | | | 17,993 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 17,993 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Crestline Summit Master SPC – Peak SP(27)
|
| | | | 14,792 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 14,792 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Crestline Summit Master SPC – Crestline Summit APEX SP(28)
|
| | | | 3,559 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 3,559 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Walleye Opportunities Master Fund Ltd(29)
|
| | | | 16,887 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 16,887 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Walleye Investments Fund LLC(30)
|
| | | | 8,446 | | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | | 8,446 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Tenor Opportunity Master Fund Ltd(31)
|
| | | | 75,000 | | | | | | 0.2 | | | | | | 75,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Fifth Lane Partners Fund LP(32)
|
| | | | 125,000 | | | | | | 0.3 | | | | | | 125,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Auto King International Limited(33)
|
| | | | 18,195,281 | | | | | | 49.2 | | | | | | 18,195,281 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Brilliant Cut Limited(34)
|
| | | | 1,362,369 | | | | | | 3.7 | | | | | | 1,362,369 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Daily Charm Holdings Limited(35)
|
| | | | 1,329,505 | | | | | | 3.6 | | | | | | 1,329,505 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Cosmic Discovery Limited(36)
|
| | | | 765,181 | | | | | | 2.1 | | | | | | 765,181 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Rainbow Avenue Limited(37)
|
| | | | 697,840 | | | | | | 1.9 | | | | | | 697,840 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Mighty Sino International Limited(38)
|
| | | | 697,083 | | | | | | 1.9 | | | | | | 697,083 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Pride Supreme Limited(39)
|
| | | | 480,283 | | | | | | 1.3 | | | | | | 480,283 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Good Hero Global Limited(40)
|
| | | | 389,738 | | | | | | 1.1 | | | | | | 389,738 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
| | | |
Securities
beneficially owned prior to this offering |
| |
Securities to
be sold in this offering |
| |
Securities
beneficially owned after this offering |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Name of Selling Securityholder
|
| |
Ordinary
Shares |
| |
%(1)
|
| |
Ordinary
Shares |
| |
Ordinary
Shares(1)(2) |
| |
%(1)(2)
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
Tiger Goal Limited(41)
|
| | | | 293,349 | | | | | | 0.8 | | | | | | 293,349 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Major Delight Limited(42)
|
| | | | 145,410 | | | | | | 0.4 | | | | | | 145,410 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Success Avenue Limited(43)
|
| | | | 130,599 | | | | | | 0.4 | | | | | | 130,599 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Grand Fortune Capital (H.K.) Company Limited(44)
|
| | | | 2,464,985 | | | | | | 6.7 | | | | | | 2,464,985 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Grand Fortune Capital, LLC(44)
|
| | | | 290,000 | | | | | | 0.8 | | | | | | 290,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Courage Elite Limited(45)
|
| | | | 512,848 | | | | | | 1.4 | | | | | | 512,848 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
China Venture Capital (Hong Kong) Co., Limited(46)
|
| | | | 256,425 | | | | | | 0.7 | | | | | | 256,425 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
IPE Group Limited(47)
|
| | | | 256,425 | | | | | | 0.7 | | | | | | 256,425 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Weitian Limited(48)
|
| | | | 69,835 | | | | | | 0.2 | | | | | | 69,835 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
J.V.B. Financial Group, LLC(49)
|
| | | | 50,000 | | | | | | 0.1 | | | | | | 50,000 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
|
Total
|
| | | | 34,415,562 | | | | | | 93.0 | | | | | | 34,415,562 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
| | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
SEC registration fee
|
| | | $ | 36,568 | | |
| |
FINRA filing fee
|
| | | | — | | |
| |
Legal fees and expenses
|
| | | | 45,000 | | |
| |
Accountants’ fees and expenses
|
| | | | 150,000 | | |
| |
Printing expenses
|
| | | | 3,000 | | |
| |
Transfer agent fees and expenses
|
| | | | 1,000 | | |
| |
Miscellaneous costs
|
| | | | 10,000 | | |
| |
Total
|
| | | $ | 245,568 | | |
|
Exhibit
Number |
| |
Description
|
|
| 2.1† | | | | |
| 4.1† | | | | |
| 4.2† | | | | |
| 4.3† | | | | |
| 4.4† | | | | |
| 5.1† | | | | |
| 5.2† | | | | |
| 23.1 | | | | |
| 23.4† | | | | |
| 23.5† | | | | |
| 24.1† | | | | |
| 107† | | | |
| |
Signature
|
| |
Title
|
| | ||
| |
/s/ Haimei Wu
Haimei Wu
|
| |
Director and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
| | ||
| |
*
Jie Li
|
| |
Acting Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
| | ||
| |
*
Wei Hou
|
| |
Director
|
| | ||
| |
*
Quan Qiu
|
| |
Director
|
| | ||
| |
*
Joseph Douglas Ragan III
|
| |
Director
|
| | ||
| |
*
Michael Mingzhao Xing
|
| |
Independent Director
|
| | ||
| |
*
Lijian Xu
|
| |
Independent Director
|
| | ||
| |
*
Gabrielle Bilciu-Wolfson
|
| |
Independent Director
|
| | | |
Exhibit 23.1

广东宝臻会计师事务所(普通合伙)
Ste. 2201, GDH Bay City Centre,
21 Zhujiang West Rd., Guangzhou
广州市天河区珠江西路 21 号
粤海金融中心 2201 室
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Form F-1 on Form F-3 of Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited of our report dated April 24, 2026, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 and for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Baird Medical Investment Holdings Limited for the year ended December 31, 2025. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.
/s/ Guangdong Prouden CPAs GP
Guangdong Prouden CPAs GP
Guangzhou, China
May 22, 2026